HomeNewsCity Council Matters: Environment,...

City Council Matters: Environment, Budget & Zoning (op-ed by Kate Doyle Feingold – former City Council Member)

There was a great win for the Fairfax City environment on Earth Day. And a great lesson for tireless residents who continued to speak up about taxpayer dollars going to build destructive, wide, paved roads through our dwindling forests. A majority of council instructed staff to redesign the George Snyder “Trail” (GST), pause the Pickett run connector and cancel the Country Club Hills (CCH) connector. Thousands of mature trees will be spared and we will all benefit from cleaner air, reduced flooding, and lower temperatures. Great progress in a tree city that is lagging far behind on preservation focused environmental actions.

At a recent council meeting on the budget, the chair of the city school board spoke about the largest budget item – our contracted payment per student to Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS). She attributed the increase in our required payment to a significant increase in student residents in the city. This can be traced to recent zoning exceptions granted for high-density housing where costs for new students, infrastructure, policing, fire services and stormwater management were not accurately accounted for. Almost every proposed housing development exceeds our current zoning density limits and eliminates or significantly reduces existing commercial space as well as any green space. This increases the tax burden on home owners – currently our tax base is 68% residential and 32% commercial. 

A very important (and related) issue is on the agenda for the May 13 council meeting. The agenda includes a discussion on a massive re-write of the city zoning ordinance. The goal is to re-write the zoning ordinance to reflect the level and density of development that has been approved within small area plans (SAP). The Fairfax Circle SAP was approved last year and envisions very high-density housing and an elimination of existing small and large business spaces. The SAPs put forward many admirable ideas with respect to green spaces and storm water control with no analysis of the high costs or who will actually pay. The result is that developers see high-density and come forward with proposals for high-density housing, very little commercial space, and little to no green spaces. From the developer’s standpoint, selling a townhome, condo, or managing apartment rentals is much easier and financially lucrative than managing commercial space (or green space). Especially when rent price-fixing software continues to be allowed in Virginia, resulting in very high rents. 

The reduction in commercial space further exacerbates our reliance on residential property tax and contributes to continued rising taxes on residents and business. The continued elimination of green spaces worsens flooding, heat island effects, and excessive impervious surfaces – 77% of Fairfax Circle is already impervious surface.

I rarely hear from residents asking for high-density development, or the elimination of commercial spaces for our small business, or the elimination of our green spaces – but if our zoning ordinance is changed to reflect what has been approved in SAPs that is exactly what could happen. The good news is there are council members who are in office because they truly care about our community, they are invested and committed to asking questions, and truly listening to residents. You can speak at public meetings on Tuesdays, on a specific topic or during the general comment period, or reach out via email to share your thoughts.

Author

365 Business Directory

spot_img

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read More Stories

We Must Destroy Democracy in Order to Save It!

About fifty years ago the United States was involved in a military conflict in Vietnam which lasted many years and did not end well. There was a phrase from that era – “We had to destroy the village in order to save it” –which encapsulated its own self-defeating logic. We know better than the natives. We must force them to appreciate our values. Fast forward to 2026.

Willard Sherwood Health and Community Center Discussions

Residents in Fairfax City have been hearing a lot about the proposed Willard Sherwood Health and Community Center (WSHCC) project discussed at recent meetings, and one number in particular keeps coming up: an estimated $1.7 million annual operating cost to the city once the project is fully implemented. While the proposal’s goals include improving services and responding to community needs, many residents are understandably asking what that figure could mean for their own property tax bills and for the city’s long-term finances. This is especially important because the WSHCC is only one of four projects with the potential to increase real estate taxes substantially.

Affordable housing is a frequent rallying cry among our leaders

In Fairfax City, affordable housing is a frequent rallying cry among our leaders. Mayor Catherine Read has repeatedly emphasized its importance to the City’s vitality and long-term growth. She’s championed diversified housing types, supportive projects like Beacon Landing, and even sought legislative changes to help religious institutions build affordable units. Those are worthy goals — but they ring hollow if other City actions make living here increasingly unaffordable.

The Willard-Sherwood Health and Community Center: A Nice-to-Have Project?

After the Council’s vote to increase the real estate tax rate to $1.055 last spring, many residents are taking a more critical look at which recommended capital improvements are “nice-to-have” projects, such as the extensive recreational component of the Willard-Sherwood Health and Community Center, and which are “must-have” projects, such as replacing the high school roof and renovating the elementary schools.