HomeFeatured StoriesOld Food Color, New...

Old Food Color, New Food Color

Vibrant shades of red and blue are seemingly the trademarks of American candy. Such colors, however, do not occur naturally.

Synthetic dyes have been used to color American foods for decades, helping to provide the signature vivid appearances that most are familiar with. However, health advocates have long called for the removal of such dyes in food ingredients, citing their adverse health effects in the hyperactivity of children, potential cancer-causing risks, and a plethora of other issues. Dr. Peter Lurise, president of the Center for Science in the Public Interest, spoke on this issue, stating, “ “Their only purpose is to make food companies money. Food dyes help make ultraprocessed foods more attractive, especially to children, often by masking the absence of a colorful ingredient, like fruit.”

This was addressed by U.S. health officials’ declaration to urge food makers to filter out the use of petroleum-based artificial colors in food production, specifically to eliminate the use of synthetic dyes by the end of next year. Rather than providing a formal agreement, health officials announced that they would rely on voluntary efforts from the food industry, and that the Food and Drug Administration would be establishing guidelines and a timeline for the industry to swap synthetic dyes with natural alternatives, which have long been used by Canada and Europe. While this move is intended to promote the health of American children, it has not all been smooth sailing.

Despite claims regarding the health issues of synthetic dyes, the Food and Drug Administration has continued to state that scientific evidence supports the safe nature of foods containing color additives. Meanwhile, other associations have stated that the entire removal of such dyes by the end of 2026 will prompt other issues, such as a spike in grocery prices. Different angles to this complex issue have carried different arguments, but the promised changes are likely to be noticeable soon.

The Food and Drug Administration announced that they would be initiating the process to revoke authorization for Citrus Red No. 2—which is commonly used to enhance the peel coloring of oranges—and Orange B—often used for sausage casings—within the approaching months. Meanwhile, they are working to entirely eliminate FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Yellow No. 6, FD&C Blue No. 1, and FD&C Blue No. 2 by the end of next year. These dyes are prevalent in cereals, candies, beverages, chips, and other token items of American pantries.

Author

365 Business Directory

spot_img

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read More Stories

We Must Destroy Democracy in Order to Save It!

About fifty years ago the United States was involved in a military conflict in Vietnam which lasted many years and did not end well. There was a phrase from that era – “We had to destroy the village in order to save it” –which encapsulated its own self-defeating logic. We know better than the natives. We must force them to appreciate our values. Fast forward to 2026.

Willard Sherwood Health and Community Center Discussions

Residents in Fairfax City have been hearing a lot about the proposed Willard Sherwood Health and Community Center (WSHCC) project discussed at recent meetings, and one number in particular keeps coming up: an estimated $1.7 million annual operating cost to the city once the project is fully implemented. While the proposal’s goals include improving services and responding to community needs, many residents are understandably asking what that figure could mean for their own property tax bills and for the city’s long-term finances. This is especially important because the WSHCC is only one of four projects with the potential to increase real estate taxes substantially.

Affordable housing is a frequent rallying cry among our leaders

In Fairfax City, affordable housing is a frequent rallying cry among our leaders. Mayor Catherine Read has repeatedly emphasized its importance to the City’s vitality and long-term growth. She’s championed diversified housing types, supportive projects like Beacon Landing, and even sought legislative changes to help religious institutions build affordable units. Those are worthy goals — but they ring hollow if other City actions make living here increasingly unaffordable.

The Willard-Sherwood Health and Community Center: A Nice-to-Have Project?

After the Council’s vote to increase the real estate tax rate to $1.055 last spring, many residents are taking a more critical look at which recommended capital improvements are “nice-to-have” projects, such as the extensive recreational component of the Willard-Sherwood Health and Community Center, and which are “must-have” projects, such as replacing the high school roof and renovating the elementary schools.