HomeOpinionWhat the Customer Wanted:...

What the Customer Wanted: George Snyder Trail – Perspective from City of Fairfax Council Member Thomas D. “Tom” Peterson

As many of you know, the Fairfax City Council held two important votes Tuesday evening of this week on the disposition of the proposed George Snyder Trail.

1️⃣ The first was to proceed with a supplemental appropriation to fund the construction contract (3-3 vote with nays by Hall, McQuillen, and Peterson; motion by Hardy Chandler, FAILED).

2️⃣ The second, with City Attorney guidance, was to cancel the project (4-2 vote in favor of cancellation by Bates, Hall, McQuillen, and Peterson; motion by Peterson, PASSED).

This highly controversial project is now cancelled.

My decision not to proceed with an appropriation and to join a majority of the Council to cancel was based on:

✅ Review and evaluation of troves of City and community based information as well as additional fact-finding on my part (based on years of professional experience on transportation, economics, and environment issues).

✅ Years of strong, broad based community concern coupled with unmet requests for consideration of alternative trail alignments and design.

✅ My commitment as an elected official to listen in earnest to citizens and act on their behalf.

As my meeting statement indicates, after years of turmoil, it is my judgment that it is time to move on to more popular and effective choices, and to approach projects in a more collaborative and informed manner.

As a postscript I have added my favorite cartoon from business school 😃on why it is so important for people to work together and respect “What the Customer Wanted!!!”

The rope swing on the bottom right of the graphic is equivalent to the gravel foot path 🌳originally proposed and embraced by the community at a cost of $250,000 (in contrast to the most recent paved and graded byway at $25.2 million).

Let’s learn constructively from this chapter in our City’s history and move ahead. A great example would be the proposed Fern Street Connector Path which we reviewed in our same meeting and is likely headed for rapid approval.

[image courtesy of Council Member Thomas D. “Tom” Peterson]

Author

365 Business Directory

spot_img

Most Popular

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Read More Stories

We Must Destroy Democracy in Order to Save It!

About fifty years ago the United States was involved in a military conflict in Vietnam which lasted many years and did not end well. There was a phrase from that era – “We had to destroy the village in order to save it” –which encapsulated its own self-defeating logic. We know better than the natives. We must force them to appreciate our values. Fast forward to 2026.

Willard Sherwood Health and Community Center Discussions

Residents in Fairfax City have been hearing a lot about the proposed Willard Sherwood Health and Community Center (WSHCC) project discussed at recent meetings, and one number in particular keeps coming up: an estimated $1.7 million annual operating cost to the city once the project is fully implemented. While the proposal’s goals include improving services and responding to community needs, many residents are understandably asking what that figure could mean for their own property tax bills and for the city’s long-term finances. This is especially important because the WSHCC is only one of four projects with the potential to increase real estate taxes substantially.

Affordable housing is a frequent rallying cry among our leaders

In Fairfax City, affordable housing is a frequent rallying cry among our leaders. Mayor Catherine Read has repeatedly emphasized its importance to the City’s vitality and long-term growth. She’s championed diversified housing types, supportive projects like Beacon Landing, and even sought legislative changes to help religious institutions build affordable units. Those are worthy goals — but they ring hollow if other City actions make living here increasingly unaffordable.

The Willard-Sherwood Health and Community Center: A Nice-to-Have Project?

After the Council’s vote to increase the real estate tax rate to $1.055 last spring, many residents are taking a more critical look at which recommended capital improvements are “nice-to-have” projects, such as the extensive recreational component of the Willard-Sherwood Health and Community Center, and which are “must-have” projects, such as replacing the high school roof and renovating the elementary schools.